3

I asked: How to say or suggest in an informal (and possibly rude) way that someone can be disregarded?, and noticed that it was quickly met with a flag and a couple of downvotes.

On the other hand, How to spell final "shhhh!" in gangster speak? was highly-upvoted.

Perhaps there is a difference in that the first one has potentially offensive English in the example sentence, while the second is talking about offensive Korean language; nevertheless, it is the language I was looking for a translation for.

Other sites in the network don't seem to have an issue with such questions - e.g. https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/155664/how-many-different-parts-of-speech-can-the-f-word-be-used-as/155673 - but of course, we are free to make our own guidelines.

Do we want to allow such questions, and should we take any special precautions?

3
  • I think that as long as the examples are hidden, this type of question is okay. – Vladhagen Oct 22 '16 at 23:11
  • may be there should be a profanity tag or some indication in the title itself that it's about rude language, to help beginners filter it out more easily – user17915 Oct 25 '16 at 0:16
  • @user17915 I've added an 'offensive' tag. I had put the 'starred-out' language in the title partly as a warning but maybe the tag is a bit more subtle (I've now removed that from the title). – topo Reinstate Monica Oct 25 '16 at 8:34
5

(Now that the flags have been dealt with, I'll post my personal view)

I think of Stack Exchange Language sites as, in general, a place to discuss topics from an adult technical/academic perspective. In alignment with that, I think all Korean words, even offensive ones, should be allowed on the site as part of genuine questions and answers.

As this is an English/Korean site I would also assume that offensive English vocabulary would be allowed, where necessary or helpful, as part of genuine examples, explanations, and so on.

I don't think genuine posts should be flagged as 'rude or abusive' simply because they are about rude language - only when the posts are themselves directly rude or abusive in their nature.

I do think that it's fair to limit use of offensive language to the minimum needed to make the point.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .